Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Want a free vacation to Bermuda? Become a terrorist. Since Obama is trying to close down Guantanamo Bay, he has to send its detainees somewhere, and in this case, it was the tropical island of Bermuda. Four men were sent there as "guest workers," with the potential to become naturalized citizens, which would allow them to travel in and out of any country they choose. Worse yet, the British government, who owns Bermuda, was never consulted about this matter.

But here's the other side of the coin: there has not been much news coverage of this story, and consequently, it is difficult to determine what, if anything, these men are guilty of. One news source claims that they were simply victims of a tense political climate and were captured in Afghanistan after fleeing persecution in China. So if that's the case, and they are completely innocent, why didn't Obama bring them to the United States? Why didn't he use them as an example of how unfairly we've treated our prisoners, show the American people their plight, and offer to help them start a new life here?

Instead, he quietly tried to settle them in Bermuda without even going through the proper channels within the British government. And now, he has offered the Pacific nation of Palau $200 million in "development and budget aid" at the same time they've agreed to take 13 more detainees.

Where do these actions fit into Obama's promise for a "transparent presidency?" He is certainly more communicative than many other presidents, what with his weekly YouTube updates, frequent press conferences, and repetitive declarations about the "historic" nature of his leadership. But transparent? I don't think so. In fact, he is totally silent when it suits him. (For example, when Dick Cheney asked that information gained from enhanced interrogation techniques be made public.)

And finally, where will we be if we have to spend $200 million on every 4 terrorists we've detained? Oh - right. We'll just print more money.

No comments:

Post a Comment